The housing boom during the pandemic has been such a bargain for investors: historically low interest rates, easy access to capital, soaring rents and skyrocketing home prices. That’s why everyone from mom-and-pop hosts to Airbnb hosts to institutional big dogs are flocking to it. invitation homeWith 82,837 US single-family homes, there were 1,523 net buyers in Q3 2021. American House 4 For RentWith 58,693 U.S. single-family homes, there were 1,292 net buyers in Q3 2021.
However, the investor frenzy that began in the summer of 2020 has subsided somewhat in the spring of 2022 after interest rates began to spike. Soaring interest rates, combined with a lack of homes for sale in 2023, have translated into some sort of institutional demand. Home purchase freeze.
Institutional firms will buy 90% fewer homes in the first quarter of 2023 compared with the first quarter of 2022, according to John Burns Research and Consulting. In the first half of 2023, invitation home (-205 houses) as is American House 4 For Rent (-300 homes) are net sellers.Yieldstreet, which owns about 700 homes, said wealth The company has not purchased any homes in 2023 through July.
That said, the next uptick may already be brewing.
On Tuesday, the MetLife Single-Family Rental Fund revealed that it has acquired Committed capital of $390 million. In addition, in July, JPMorgan Asset Management Announces Intention to Form a $625 Million Joint Venture Partnering with American Homes 4 Rent, plans to develop rental housing across the country. Additionally, Invitation Homes acquired a “portfolio of nearly 1,900 homes” on July 18 for about $650 million — a move that will hopefully position it as a net buyer after third-quarter results.
This all raises the question: how long will institutional firms be timid? If anything, will it spark another madness?
To find out, wealth reach out Noel Christopher. He is one of the nation’s leading thought leaders in the single-family rental (SFR) and build-to-rent (BTR) space.
FORTUNE: What’s Driving the Pandemic-Era Institutional Housing Bull Market?
Interest rates, demand for rental properties, and the need to deploy capital.
Interest rates speak for themselves. Demand for rental housing will continue to drive demand for housing, both rental and owner-occupied. Single-family rental spaces are no longer on the fringe. It is one of, if not the largest real estate asset class. With the persistent undersupply of homes, demand will fuel demand and thus investors large and small.
Why did the rate spike coincide with the unwinding of the institutional real estate bull market?
One leads to the other. This is basic economics. Just as interest rates have put off many homebuyers, it has also put off large institutional investors. The interest rate shock is unprecedented. These investors are experiencing this for the first time in the SFR space. No one knows what to expect. This causes most people to put everything on hold. Many people will continue to buy in many markets if they have a crystal ball.
Not only are many institutional homebuyers on hold, some are even direct net sellers. These include Invitation Homes — the largest single-family homeowner in the U.S. —which sold more homes (378) than it acquired (276) in Q2 2023. This marks the third consecutive quarter that rental operators have been net sellers. Is this a temporary respite, or a long-term institutional pause?
This is temporary. They pause and continue picking their portfolios as usual. 378 of 80,000 homes is nothing to Invitation Homes. They’ve been buying portfolios strategically and moving into the “build-to-rent” space. I remember Invitation Homes not being interested in BTR a few years ago. They turned quickly. If the numbers work, they are buyers. The resale market, as well as big buyers, has come to a standstill. Mom-and-pop buyers are gaining momentum and trying to fill the gap in buying and rehabbing older homes.
What needs to happen to spur another wave of institutional home buying?
Stability in debt markets is one of them. Additionally, there is a supply of resale homes. More homes need to be bought on a massive scale before the market lifts constraints (interest rates). Those with a vision are preparing to buy; I know that for sure. There’s been a lot of speculation among YouTube content providers that big investors are ditching rental properties to get out of the “deal.” This has been debunked many times.
How would you describe the difference between single-family rental spaces versus rental spaces today?
BTR debt is cheaper and they can create supply. Additionally, large multifamily operators could look at BTR and enter the space aggressively. Operationally, it is easier to manage than SFR. Scattered site SFR space will always exist. For the 15+ million homes that institutional investors have barely touched, don’t count on SFR. Only some people want to live in rental communities. There is something to be said for living in an owner-occupied home. For all of the supply-related reasons above, this is going to change at some point. Likewise, rental demand will continue for some time. The housing finance system is bad for consumers.
Where do you see the biggest opportunities in this field in the next five years?
There are many opportunities. As the sector develops, opportunities to allow institutional investors to invest through local operators employing local suppliers will increase. Many markets require more professionally managed rental housing that is hard to come by for capital. Some groups are building strong marketplaces to make this happen. Some focus on smaller investors like Roofstock. Some of them focus on high-profile investors like Avenue One. I’m also very interested in the field of home equity investing. The industry will grow exponentially in the next 1-3 years. The ability for a homeowner or investor to sell their equity and keep interest rates low is enormous. Increased tax benefits; I think this area is a huge win. Groups such as Bonus Homes on the SFR HEI side and Unlock on the owner-occupied side will make big moves. Some groups like HEX are building marketplaces to support this, which could be a big winner.
Institutional home buying is only a relatively small piece of the investor buying pie, let alone the entire home buying pie, which has come under a lot of scrutiny. Some onlookers say institutional firms are helping push up prices. How do you respond to these types of complaints?
I’ve spent a lot of time trying to debunk misconceptions about this. As I mentioned, there needs to be more housing. For every home purchased by a homebuyer, one is also taken away from the renter. Rental housing has been around for a long time. Homeownership rates have held steady over the past few years. Although it has increased a lot over the past few years. The demographics of renters has also changed, with renters having the option to earn more income and rent. This doesn’t just happen by accident. It coincided with the rise of institutional investors. Renting from a professional landlord ensures that the home will sell from someone other than the renter. Believe it or not, institutional investors are meeting the needs of renters and providing renters with well-maintained, well-managed homes. Most of the time, these investors buy older homes that exceed the maintenance threshold that homeowners are willing to undertake. Also, since institutional investors only make up about 3% of the rental housing stock, it doesn’t make sense that they have little influence on the market. There are specific markets that are highly concentrated. The truth is, they will only buy a home if the numbers work. They need to set rents above what the market accepts. We see this all the time. If you ask too much, the market will tell you.
Our housing finance system is broken. The demand for housing will only increase. The country’s real estate market relies on private investors to build new and refurbish older homes for people to live in. Once this situation changes, we will only be able to rely on these private investors to provide housing. They will also be entitled to a risk-reward for doing so. I say all this while small investors dominate the single-family rental market and will for a long time, unlike multi-family housing, which is about 50% institutionalized change. I don’t think single-family rentals will exceed 10% for a long time. Remember, regulation that targets large investors often hurts small investors.
Want to know the latest developments in the real estate market? Follow me on Twitter: @newslambert.